Articles

The British authorities' brutal enforcement of press- and reporting bans in grooming cases appears more politically motivated than justified by considerations of justice and legality.

We know it ad nauseum: Anyone who speaks against the cultural radical agenda, must be cowed. All tricks may be – and are - used. Especially misquoting.

So, here we have one of Western Europe's most prestigious mainstream media - effectively revealed as a fraudulent producer of fake news. The sharp contrast between the scale of the Panorama scandal and the unanimous silence of the mainstream media, however, cries out to heaven.

If the government wants to illustrate the Russian threat, then it is doing an exceptionally poor job of it, and it is very worrying that all of the examples that will now serve to justify such a massive restriction on Danish freedom of speech, cannot stand the rigors of a fact check.

The combination of a political establishment that seems increasingly willing to sacrifice freedom of speech for short-term gains, a self-conscious, immature and offended student segment, and a group of scared teachers and professors with acute cases of “consideration-itis” – is pure poison for the free word:

The Global Conduct for Safe Migration agreement's carte blanche to the government, giving them the framework with which to judge the media's handling of migrants, is an attack on freedom of expression and freedom of the press, a freedom which ensures citizens’ access to information, and with it the ability to choose between information channels themselves in order to form their own opinion.

Douglas Murray receives the Sappho Award because he has done his homework  so brilliantly and stood up staunchly for his position in the debate. 
   Your books, your articles, and your public appearances demonstrate the importance of truth - therefore, in the perspective of free speech, you are an inspiring example to follow.

Many aspects of the Tommy Robinson case should cause all manner of alarm bells to sound.  There is very good reason to take interest in this case, for this can turn out to be the proverbial canary in the coal mine.

I have now been gradually vaccinated ad nauseam against all the unending crying, wringing of hands, agonized excuses and gushing demonstrations of regret, expressed every time threats from offended Muslims feelings rears up its ugly head: by Lars Løkke when he talks about "the rape of Islam". By torch-lit vigils. Of “Imagine”-singing people holding pencils aloft. Of all the Je Suis campaigns. It is a devoid-of-consequence, virtue-signaling attempt to “purchase indulgences” so to speak, and an excuse for not doing anything at all - and it most certainly will not make any potential terrorist wonder if our will to defend our values is so strong that he might as well pack up his weapons and crawl out of the truck.