Tulsi Gabbard’s speech is a confrontation with censorship, European self-deception, and an Islamic ideology that, in her view, constitutes the greatest threat to freedom of expression in our time.

What was supposed to be a solidarity demonstration for the freedom of the Iranian people turned out to be an aestheticised, content-free exercise in virtue signalling, in which Amnesty reduced the participants to extras in its left-wing choreography.

Britain bars yet another Islam-critical voice while the asylum system collapses and free speech comes under pressure.

Iranian women are risking their lives in a confrontation with Islamic tyranny, while Danish public service and the entire left look the other way. The silence is not accidental—it is ideological. And it is yet another argument for abolishing media subsidies.

South of the border, democracy, freedom of expression, and press freedom are currently in deep crisis. Yet state-funded media remain silent about it. That is deeply troubling.

“The Trump administration and Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s entry ban last week on Europe’s censorship-industrial complex is condemned by those in power and their state-funded media in Europe, but a thorough article in an independent German outlet exposes close ties between the country’s old ruling parties and a dangerous censorship-industrial complex that defends censorship and its public gatekeeper role by repeating and elevating a thoroughly Orwellian propaganda falsehood.”

Chairman Aia Fog and Deputy Chairman Michael Pihl of Danish Free Press Society comments on The Free Speech Union and their obvious lack of interest in supporting the working class.

_